With more renewable energy projects planned across the Highlands and Islands in a bid for greener, securer power, a campaign group says two energy giants have "a 100 per cent approval record by the Scottish Government".
"Now the public have been made aware that SSEN and their parent company SSE appear to have rubber stamps with their names on it in the Scottish Government, they will be horrified," said the campaign group Communities B4 Power Companies (CB4PC).
In Scotland, energy companies wanting to build power stations generating over 50MW, or install or modify overhead power lines, must apply to the Scottish Government’s Energy Consents Unit (ECU), rather than to local councils, for approval.
Following Freedom of Information requests, CB4PC said in March: "The Scottish Government has not refused any SSE or SSEN planning applications in the last 15 years.
"The only slight blip for SSE was when Glencassley wind farm was refused but approved when re-jigged and re-named Achany Extension," it says. "Both multinationals have a 100 per cent approval record by the Scottish Government.
"No grid connection for wind developments have been refused either – no matter how far or what landscape it goes through.
"SSEN is currently proposing nation-changing infrastructure to connect more wind turbines to the grid. The cost is billions of pounds, and the emissions and costs for this are also kept separate from the wind turbines it is expected to encourage."
Spokeswoman for CB4PC, Lyndsey Ward, added: "It certainly explains why communities have come to expect these particular multinationals to get approval for their proposals even if they have been refused by the local authority.
"People often feel, and have been told so by SSEN staff at public consultations, that there is no point objecting, it is a ‘done deal’ and that the Scottish ministers back them.
"Now this apparent guaranteed approval is public knowledge maybe, just maybe, the Scottish Government will actually change course and heed public opinion instead of helping to boost the wealth of shareholders in these global investment companies at the expense of the UK-wide consumer, electorate and the environment."
A spokesperson for SSEN Transmission told us: “We have significant experience and expertise in the development of critical national electricity transmission network infrastructure in the north of Scotland, where our developments are informed by extensive public and statutory stakeholder consultation and follow robust processes, in line with all necessary planning and regulatory policies.
“Prior to the Scottish Government’s determination of our Section 37 planning applications, these applications are first considered by relevant local authorities. To illustrate the robustness of our planning processes, in the 15+ years since the Beauly Denny line was referred to a public local inquiry, we have submitted in excess of 40 Section 37 overhead line applications and on just three occasions have our Section 37 applications been formally objected to by local planning committees. On all three occasions, these objections went against the clear recommendation of those local authorities’ own planning officers and for two of these decisions, there were no other statutory stakeholder objections to consider.
“We remain committed to consult extensively with all stakeholders as part of the development of our projects to help ensure our final proposals balance stakeholder feedback against key environmental, technical and economic considerations and the planning and regulatory policies that underpin the robust planning regime under which we operate.”
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “Scotland has some of the most stringent environmental impact regulations anywhere in the world and our planning and consenting system ensures that local communities can always have their say. Clear guidance is in place to ensure early public consultation and engagement is carried out for all large-scale infrastructure proposals.
“Any consenting application submitted to the Scottish Government for consideration is subject to consultation with the public and statutory and local bodies. Potential impacts on communities, nature and other valued natural assets or cultural heritage are important considerations in the decision-making process.”
Yes! I would like to be sent emails from West Coast Today
I understand that my personal information will not be shared with any third parties, and will only be used to provide me with useful targeted articles as indicated.
I'm also aware that I can un-subscribe at any point either from each email notification or on My Account screen.